Gist of some CIC Decisions under RTI Act

Article

Gist of some CIC Decisions under RTI Act

Prescription of Application Forms:

  • Prescription of form can be done.
  • Forms should be simple.
  • Reasons for seeking information should not be asked in the Forms.
  • Hand written applications are acceptable.

Sharing of File Noting’s:

  • Citizens have right to seek information about File Noting’s except those hit by section 8(1) & 9 of the Act.
  • File noting provided by other organisation/bank stands covered under fiduciary relationship and cannot be disclosed. 

Sharing of information available in Fiduciary relationship:

  • Copies of evaluated answer sheets may be provided but names of the examiner can’t be disclosed.
  • Answer key to question paper may be furnished.
  • Marks awarded by different Members in interview cannot be disclosed.
  • Project Reports are covered under fiduciary relationship and cannot be given.
  • List of borrowers is covered under fiduciary relationship and cannot be disclosed.
  • File noting provided by other organisation/ bank stands covered by fiduciary relationship and cannot be disclosed.
  • Documents provided by Companies are covered under fiduciary relationship.
  • Annual Performance Reports stand covered under fiduciary relationship and cannot be given. 

Role of Information Commission in imposing penalty/ grant of awards:

  • First Appellate Authority is not covered by the penal provision but disciplinary action can be ordered against them.
  • Grant of compensation has been ordered in some cases of metal torture.
  • Damages have been ordered to be paid in some cases where applicants suffered some economic loss. 

Service matters:

  • Details of immovable property returns of government servants can be shared.
  • Documents provided by a candidate relating to selection for a post can be supplied.
  • Tour Programme of officers can be shared.
  • Enquiry report where evidence has been given in confidence cannot be furnished.
  • Annual performance appraisal reports are covered under 8(1)(j).
  • Bio data of applicants can be shared.
  • Medical reports of other candidates cannot to be provided.
  • Criteria for promotion can be given.
  • Agreed List for promotion can be disclosed.
  • Information about re-employment can be disclosed.
  • Conduct of examinations is a confidential activity.
  • Merit list of candidates can be shown.
  • Specific reasons about ignoring promotion by DPC should be intimated.
  • Qualifications of public servants can be given.
  • Procedure of appointment can be told.
  • Self-appraisal report of third party cannot be given.
  • GPF Account of third party cannot be shown.
  • Rules for creation/abolition of posts can be supplied.
  • Merit list of driving test for appointment can be shared.
  • Grant of promotion not covered under Commissions purview.
  • Rank in merit list of unsuccessful candidate not be disclosed. 

Financial/Banking matters:

  • Bank accounts of other companies are secret.
  • Bank are to maintain secrecy of affairs.
  • Bank can not disclose valuation reports.
  • Loan details cannot be given.
  • Income tax returns of individual are confidential.
  • Income tax assessment orders in case of suspicion of corruption could be disclosed.
  • Tax returns of third party cannot be disclosed.
  • Disclosure of Tax Evasion Petition report can be done which are based on complaints.
  • Income Tax Returns is personal and cannot be shared.
  • Provide investigation report in TEP case after completion.
  • Operation of bank accounts is a contract between bank and parties.
  • Disclosure of voluntary information about income tax not permissible. 

Supply information in available form:

  • Information be provided in form in which it exists.
  • Supply information in desired format, where it can be done without disturbing the normal functioning. 

Electronic form:

  • Information not to be created for the applicant in electronic form. 

Voluminous records:

  • Disclose information without unduly increasing the workload.
  • Applicant may be invited to inspect and identify records required. 
  • Provision of information in Sub-judice Matters:
  • Obtain information through court in sub-judice matters.
  • Information about investigation in crime case to be decided on case to case basis.
  • Information where prosecution proceedings are in advance stage cannot to be given.
  • Matter under investigation may impede process of investigation. 

Impede the process of investigation:

  • Supply of information during court proceedings may impedes the process of prosecution. As such the information can be denied.
  • Information that may impede the process of prosecution can be withheld. 

RTI not a tool for grievance redressal:

  • Information and redress of grievance are distinct.
  • Grievance redressal beyond commissions’ jurisdiction. 

Old information:

  • 20 year old information can be provided if not hit by section 8(1).
  • Information about old record destroyed as per policy cannot be provided. 

Seeking Opinion or advice:

  • Reply in Yes/No ought not to be given.
  • RTI not to answer queries.
  • Don’t seek opinion or advice.
  • Who and why cannot be answered. 

Third party Information:

  • Personal information containing business detail cannot be given.
  • Lodgment of an individual in jail is not covered under privacy.
  • Personal information of a third party fiduciary capacity.
  • Details about oil company sales.
  • Letter of permission. 

Trade secrets:

  • Audited balance sheets of third party cannot be shown
  • Copy of ledger account can’t be given. 

Unwarranted invasion of privacy:

  • Action taken against Police Officers amounts to invasion of privacy.
  • Information not held in confidence cannot be denied.
  • Matrimonial dispute information cannot be given. 

Different laws when persist

  • No right to obtain certified copies under RTI where different laws for providing such copies prevail.
  • Seek information under relevant Act (where permissible) 

Fees:

  • BPL not to pay cost of documents.
  • Charge for priced publications.
  • Supply free information in case of delay.

Miscellaneous

  • Desist from using offensive language.
  • Applicant has right to know the conclusion.
  • Clarity in information required.
  • Citizen of India can get information (on behalf of society)
  • Contract on completion does not remain confidential
  • Provide assistance in inspection of files.
  • Supply information not withstanding one’s personal standing.
  • Investigate fairly in complaint cases. 

Information:

  • A claim made by someone cannot be construed as information. 
  • Information that is not available cannot be supplied.
  • Future course of action is not information. 

Need to follow procedures:

  • Transfer RTI application or part thereof to the concerned Public Authority within 5 days.
  • Transfer of application within the same Public Authority not permissible.
  • Inform applicant about transfer of his application.
  • Time limit begins from date of receipt of oral/written request.
  • The PIO and Appellate Authorities should pass speaking orders.
  • Reply sent by APIO is valid provided it is issued with the approval of the Public Information Officer.  
  • Seeking assistance of other Officers in replying not violation.
  • Officers whose assistance is sought in disposal of RTI request can be held responsible for delays.
  • Provide information which is not hit by exceptions even if it is in custody of the highest authority.
  • Reject RTI applications as per provisions of the Act or rulings given by Higher Courts.
  • Prefer first appeal before filing second appeal before the Information Commission.
  • First Appellate Authority is required to dispose of appeals in 30-45 days.
  • Particulars of the first Appellate Authority be provided to the applicant while sending reply.
  • Non intimation of particulars of first Appellate Authority amounts to violation of provisions of the RTI Act.
  • Applicant cannot make additional demand of information at appellate stage.
  • Appeal does not survive when first Appellate Authority gives orders for supply of information.
  • CPIO/PIO cannot file appeal against the orders of First Appellate Authority.
  • Applicants may personally collect information, if he so chooses.
  • Avoid delay in sending replies.
  • The PM Office can transfer RTI applications to the Public Authority more closely connected with the request.
  • Apply mind before disposal of RTI requests/appeals.
  • Avoid duplication of work in organisations.
  • Pleading by advocates is avoidable.  
  • Service of subsequent pleadings should be done by the parties to the opposite parties.
  • Improve record management system.
  • Inspection of files be allowed at one place, where the files are available in a scattered manner, at different places. 

Limitation of Information Commission:

  • Commission has no powers to issue directions for ordering award of tender to L-I.
  • Commission cannot rule on correctness of statements.
  • Commission cannot issue directions in the matters concerning government policy.
  • Commission is not to perform auditing function.
  • Commission cannot orders for rectification of Rules.
  • Appointment and establishment matters do not fall within purview of commission.
  • Commission is not the appropriate forum for an execution of Decree on the orders passed by the High Courts.
  • Grievances related to service matters should be taken up with the appropriate authority. 

Invasion in privacy of individuals/traders:

  • Interception of phone calls is highly confidential.
  • Importers’/Exporters’ information is forbidden from disclosure.
  • Immigration details are confidential.
  • Intellectual property is hit by invasion of privacy.
  • Confidential Clause of agreement cannot be disclosed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sharing of Third Party Information under RTI Act

Important decisions of the Supreme Court on RTI Act – Part XV

Role & Responsibility of Assistant Public Information Officers Under RTI Act, 2005